New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

Politics

Trump asks Supreme Court to extend delay in election case, claiming presidential immunity

by admin February 13, 2024
February 13, 2024
Trump asks Supreme Court to extend delay in election case, claiming presidential immunity

Former President Trump is asking the Supreme Court to extend the delay in the trial stemming from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s 2020 election interference case, arguing that he has presidential immunity to protect him from prosecution.

Trump attorneys on Monday afternoon filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court just days after a D.C. appeals court ruled the former president and 2024 GOP front-runner is not immune from prosecution in Smith’s case.

The request is for temporary relief, to stay or block the appeals court mandate from taking effect, which would give the Trump legal team more time to file an appeal to the Supreme Court on the merits of whether a former president deserves immunity from criminal prosecution for actions while in office.

The trial stemming from Smith’s case against Trump is on hold pending resolution of the immunity question.

The Justice Department may ask for expedited consideration of this initial emergency appeal.

‘If the prosecution of a President is upheld, such prosecutions will recur and become increasingly common, ushering in destructive cycles of recrimination,’ the request states. ‘Criminal prosecution, with its greater stigma and more severe penalties, imposes a far greater ‘personal vulnerability’ on the President than any civil penalty.’

The request adds, ‘The threat of future criminal prosecution by a politically opposed Administration will overshadow every future President’s official acts — especially the most politically controversial decisions.’

The request states that the president’s ‘political opponents will seek to influence and control his or her decisions via effective extortion or blackmail with the threat, explicit or implicit, of indictment by a future, hostile Administration, for acts that do not warrant any such prosecution.’

‘This threat will hang like a millstone around every future President’s neck, distorting Presidential decision-making, undermining the President’s independence, and clouding the President’s ability ‘to deal fearlessly and impartially with’ the duties of his office.” 

Trump’s lawyers added, ‘Without immunity from criminal prosecution, the Presidency as we know it will cease to exist.’ 

A Trump spokesperson described the filing as a ‘powerhouse filing.’

‘As President Trump’s powerhouse Supreme Court filing explains, if immunity is not granted to a President, every future President who leaves office will face the prospect of being wrongfully indicted by the opposing party,’ the spokesperson told Fox News Digital. ‘Without complete immunity, the President of the United States will not be able to function properly. Even while the President is still in office, his political opponents will use the threat of future prosecution as a weapon, effectively blackmailing and extorting him to influence his most sensitive and important decisions.’

The spokesperson added, ‘The Supreme Court should grant the requested stay and put an end to Deranged Jack Smith’s repeated attempts to corruptly short-circuit the ordinary and correct functioning of our justice system.’

The filing comes after Washington, D.C., federal Judge Tanya Chutkan earlier this month officially delayed the trial, which was set to begin on March 4– a day before the critical Super Tuesday primary contests, when Alabama, Alaska, American Samoa, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Vermont vote to select a GOP nominee.

Chutkan said in December that she does not have jurisdiction over the matter while it is pending before the Supreme Court, and she put a pause on the case against the Republican 2024 front-runner until the high court determines its involvement.

Smith charged the former president with conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights. Those charges stemmed from Smith’s investigation into whether Trump was involved in the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, and any alleged interference in the 2020 election result.

Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges in August 2023.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Trump expected back in court for classified documents hearing in special secure Florida facility
next post
Stone Age megastructure found submerged in the Baltic Sea wasn’t formed by nature, scientists say

Related Posts

RNC co-chair Lara Trump promises to prosecute anyone...

June 17, 2024

Speaker Johnson says it’s U.S.’s ‘biblical admonition’ to...

April 16, 2024

Biden camp reportedly fears photos from special counsel...

February 5, 2024

Harris tells NABJ she expects to ‘earn’ the...

September 18, 2024

Hillary Clinton says Biden’s age a ‘legitimate issue,’...

February 11, 2024

Harris, Trump favorability ratings are on the rise...

August 15, 2024

Key Bolsonaro lieutenant blasts Biden for silence on...

September 8, 2024

Democrats plot coup to ‘save democracy,’ but what...

July 20, 2024

Army suspends commander after Trump, Vance, Hegseth vanish...

April 22, 2025

VP Harris may continue Biden’s torch of championing...

July 30, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Johnson erupts over ‘dangerous’ Biden mental decline ‘cover-up,’ while Democrats push Epstein disclosure

      July 24, 2025
    • House panel directs chairman to subpoena Bill and Hillary Clinton in Epstein probe

      July 24, 2025
    • Trump declares US will win global AI race during executive order signing ceremony: ‘Whatever it takes’

      July 24, 2025
    • Pro-Israel Dem says those who won’t decry Hamas over Oct. 7 attack ‘have no business’ posing as humanitarians

      July 24, 2025
    • Senate Republicans call on DOJ to appoint special counsel in Obama-Russia investigation

      July 24, 2025
    • ‘Shirts and Skins’: How one Republican bridged the gap to pass Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’

      July 24, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      Top 5 Junior Copper Stocks on the TSXV in 2023

      December 22, 2023
    • 2

      Crypto Market 2023 Year-End Review

      December 22, 2023
    • 3

      Canada Silver Cobalt Begins Drilling at Lowney-Lac Edouard in Quebec, Targeting Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Mineralization

      December 22, 2023
    • 4

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 5

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 6

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023
    • 7

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024

    Categories

    • Business (1,419)
    • Investing (3,590)
    • Politics (4,680)
    • World (4,461)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved