New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

Business

Chase customers sue over fees for depositing checks that bounce

by admin February 23, 2024
February 23, 2024
Chase customers sue over fees for depositing checks that bounce

JPMorgan Chase was sued by customers who accused the largest U.S. bank of having unfairly charged fees when they deposited checks that, through no fault of their own, bounced.

In a proposed class action filed on Tuesday night, five customers said New York-based Chase docked $12 “deposited item returned fees” from their accounts when checks they tried to deposit were returned unpaid.

Checks can bounce for many reasons, including when writers do not have enough money in their accounts or issue stop payment orders, or when the checks contain errors.

The Chase customers called the bank’s “junk fees” for returned checks “unconscionable” and “predatory,” citing an October 2022 U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau bulletin that said indiscriminately charging such fees was likely illegal.

“By charging these deposited item return fees, Chase unfairly targeted its customers with financial penalties for faulty checks the customers had no hand in issuing,” the complaint said. “They did nothing wrong, yet were penalized.”

Chase declined to comment on the lawsuit, but said it stopped charging the fees in December 2022.

The five customers said they were charged between November 2021 and October 2022.

Their lawyer Lisa Considine called imposing the fees “a pervasive and unfair industry practice.”

The complaint seeks at least $5 million of damages for Chase customers nationwide, alleging violations of New York, California, Illinois and New Jersey consumer protection laws. It was filed in the White Plains, New York federal court.

In October, the Biden administration called for a crackdown on hidden and surprise fees in banking and other sectors including car rentals, hotels and concert tickets, saying the fees cost Americans tens of billions of dollars a year.

The case is Maslowski et al v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 24-01277.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
More than 15 million Toshiba laptop adapters recalled due to fire hazards
next post
Blue Sky Uranium Announces a Positive New Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Ivana Uranium-Vanadium Deposit, Amarillo Grande Project, Argentina

Related Posts

Party City to close all of its stores,...

December 21, 2024

Hertz says 2024 hack exposed some customers’ driver...

April 16, 2025

This California startup is cleaning water and removing...

June 5, 2025

Don’t freak out about the stock market’s inflation...

February 17, 2024

Fatburger parent company, chairman charged in alleged fraud...

May 13, 2024

Former MGM Grand casino president to be sentenced...

May 9, 2024

Elon Musk’s X Corp. files notice in Alex...

November 18, 2024

Philadelphia Fed President Patrick Harker advocates for interest...

August 24, 2024

Ad revenue should stabilize for media companies in...

December 31, 2024

Federal prosecutors are examining financial transactions at Block,...

May 2, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Jasmine Crockett rips Trump ‘regime,’ vows ‘solidarity’ with Biden witnesses during House probe

      July 12, 2025
    • Who is Ashley Williams, the longtime Biden aide grilled by House GOP investigators Friday?

      July 12, 2025
    • David Gergen, trusted White House advisor to 4 US presidents across decades, dies at 83

      July 12, 2025
    • Inside longtime Biden aide’s marathon closed-door grilling in House GOP cover-up probe

      July 12, 2025
    • DAVID MARCUS: Trump is flunking his MAGA base’s Jeffrey Epstein test

      July 12, 2025
    • Crypto Market Recap: Bitcoin Hits All-Time High as ETF Inflows and Legislation Align​

      July 12, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      Top 5 Junior Copper Stocks on the TSXV in 2023

      December 22, 2023
    • 2

      Canada Silver Cobalt Begins Drilling at Lowney-Lac Edouard in Quebec, Targeting Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Mineralization

      December 22, 2023
    • 3

      Crypto Market 2023 Year-End Review

      December 22, 2023
    • 4

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 5

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 6

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024
    • 7

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023

    Categories

    • Business (1,407)
    • Investing (3,493)
    • Politics (4,565)
    • World (4,461)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved