New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

Politics

Netanyahu, Israel blast UN court decision over illegal settlements ruling: ‘Fundamentally wrong’

by admin July 20, 2024
July 20, 2024
Netanyahu, Israel blast UN court decision over illegal settlements ruling: ‘Fundamentally wrong’

The United Nation’s top court has ruled Israel’s settlements in the Palestinian territories are illegal, and they must be removed immediately.

‘The State of Israel is under the obligation to bring an end to its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible,’ ICJ President Nawaf Salam said when he delivered the court’s findings on Friday, stressing that the ‘continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is illegal.’ 

The opinion is merely advisory and is not legally binding. The court specifically aimed to provide its view on Israel’s policies and practices as well as the legal status of the settlements, the BBC reported. 

The court in May demanded Israel ‘immediately halt its military offensive’ against Hamas in Rafah, the Palestinian terrorist group’s final stronghold in the Gaza Strip.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu strongly rejected the court’s conclusion, arguing in a statement posted on X that ‘Jewish people are not occupiers in their own land, including in our eternal capital Jerusalem nor in Judea and Samaria, our historic homeland.

‘No absurd opinion in The Hague can deny this historical truth or the legal right of Israelis to live in their own communities in our ancestral home.’ 

The Israeli Foreign Ministry issued a longer, more detailed statement through its spokesperson Oren Marmorstein, who posted on social media platform X that ‘Israel rejects the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that was published today regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.’ 

‘Unfortunately, the Court’s opinion is fundamentally wrong,’ Marmorstein wrote. ‘It mixes politics and law. It injects the politics of the corridors of the U.N. in New York into the courtrooms of the ICJ in The Hague.

‘The opinion is completely detached from the reality of the Middle East: While Hamas, Iran and other terrorist elements are attacking Israel from seven fronts … with the aim of obliterating it, and in the aftermath of the greatest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, the opinion ignores the atrocities that took place on October 7, as well as the security imperative of Israel to defend its territory and its citizens,’ Marmostein continued.

‘It should be emphasized that the opinion is blatantly one-sided,’ Marmostein added. ‘It ignores the past: The historical rights of the State of Israel and the Jewish people in the Land of Israel.

‘It is detached from the present: from the reality on the ground and the agreements between the parties,’ he stressed. ‘And it is dangerous for the future: it distances the parties from the only possible solution, which is direct negotiations.’

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust and president at Human Rights Voices, told Fox News Digital the court’s opinion ‘literally throws out the Oslo Accords and U.N. Security Council resolutions.’

‘It is impossible to overstate the legal perversion from this U.N. Court,’ Bayefsky said. ‘It was read out by its president, who is a politician from Lebanon (whose name was on the ballot to be the prime minister of Lebanon in the last two elections), a country that doesn’t even recognize Israel’s right to exist. Incredibly, the court openly states it didn’t need to find any specific facts in violation of international law before reaching its conclusions, including before making the slanderous claim that Israel is guilty of the crime against humanity of apartheid. It took the court all of four mini-paragraphs to reach the apartheid conclusion.

‘The U.N. and its kangaroo court says it knows best — the same U.N. that today is controlled by a vicious antisemitic majority, elects the judges and chooses the poison, in this case, legal farce — which, make no mistake, has one goal: to devastate and destroy the Jewish state.’

Israel already suffered a legal blow from the International Criminal Court, a separate legal governing body in the Netherlands, in which Prosecutor Karim Khan filed applications for arrest warrants against Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, in addition to leaders of Hamas.

The State Department did not respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment by the time of publication.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Five more House Democrats call on Biden to drop out, third US senator
next post
Greeks grieve, Turks celebrate as Cyprus marks 50 years of division

Related Posts

US intelligence confirms some claims about UNRWA staff...

February 23, 2024

Pastor Max Lucado: Surviving a challenging election season...

August 11, 2024

Israel strikes back at Iran: Five key questions

April 20, 2024

Trump lawyers move to dismiss Jack Smith 2020...

October 25, 2024

Putin shared surprising advice with Iranian counterpart following...

April 17, 2024

Israel recovers 6 dead hostages in ‘complex rescue...

August 21, 2024

DeSantis’ governorship timeline coincides with a presidential campaign...

January 25, 2024

RFK Jr. sworn in as Health and Human...

February 14, 2025

Fact check: No, Biden has never been a...

July 14, 2024

DNI Gabbard sounds off on Europe’s ‘divergence’ from...

March 3, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Duffy just got an additional job in Trump’s administration — and he’s not the only one wearing multiple hats

      July 11, 2025
    • ‘It will happen quickly’: State Dept poised to act after Supreme Court green-lights agency layoffs

      July 11, 2025
    • Duffy just got an additional job in Trump’s administration, and he’s not the only one wearing multiple hats

      July 11, 2025
    • State Department to begin mass layoffs of about 1,800 employees in coming days

      July 11, 2025
    • Biden cover-up probe heats up as another ex-White House aide sits down with GOP

      July 11, 2025
    • State Department to axe 1,800 employees

      July 11, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      Top 5 Junior Copper Stocks on the TSXV in 2023

      December 22, 2023
    • 2

      Canada Silver Cobalt Begins Drilling at Lowney-Lac Edouard in Quebec, Targeting Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Mineralization

      December 22, 2023
    • 3

      Crypto Market 2023 Year-End Review

      December 22, 2023
    • 4

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 5

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 6

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024
    • 7

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023

    Categories

    • Business (1,407)
    • Investing (3,489)
    • Politics (4,560)
    • World (4,461)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved