New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

Politics

FLASHBACK: Top Harris campaign aide was key voice in WH push to remove COVID info from tech platforms

by admin August 28, 2024
August 28, 2024
FLASHBACK: Top Harris campaign aide was key voice in WH push to remove COVID info from tech platforms

A current top campaign adviser for VP Kamala Harris was deeply involved in pushing Facebook to suppress ‘misinformation’ in an effort to control the political narrative on COVID and other issues.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted in a letter on Monday while expressing regret that his company, Facebook, was pressured by the Biden-Harris administration to censor Americans, particularly regarding COVID-19 content, bringing to the forefront actions taken by Harris’ deputy campaign manager Rob Flaherty as part of that pressure campaign.

Flaherty, who previously served as the White House director of digital strategy, helped lead the campaign to target alleged ‘misinformation’ relating to the COVID-19 virus and its vaccinations, FOX Business previously reported.

Flaherty emailed Google team members in April 2021 to ‘connect […] about the work you’re doing to combat vaccine hesitancy, but also crack down on vaccine misinformation,’ according to the documents. 

Flaherty continued asking for trends surrounding vaccine misinformation on the website, while offering government assistance in the form of COVID experts at the White House to partner in product work with YouTube. 

Google, in an internal email, noted that after a subsequent meeting with Flaherty, the White House staffer ‘particularly dug in on our decision making for borderline content’ – which is content that doesn’t cross Community Guidelines but rather brushes up against it, according to YouTube. 

A week later, Google acknowledged that it sent the White House the total amount of videos removed for COVID vaccine misinformation, while discussing the government’s desire for even more data.

‘Really [Flaherty’s] interested in what we’re seeing that is NOT coming down,’ read an internal Google email between employees, seemingly referring to videos that had not yet been removed. 

According to internal company communications viewed by FOX Business and reported on in 2023, Flaherty asked Facebook if they could provide government agencies with special access to tools to target users in 2021. 

‘Since it’s a global pandemic, can we give agencies access to targeting parameters that they normally wouldn’t be able to?’ Flaherty asked.

The idea came up in a conversation about how to convince people worried about side effects around the COVID vaccine to take it.

On an April 5 call, a Facebook employee mentioned how if someone was worried about nosebleeds as a side effect of the vaccine, in an ideal world, they would direct them to information addressing that concern. Flaherty asked the Facebook team, ‘Are you able to provide resources?’ 

Another Facebook employee replied that doing something like showing them a targeted resource addressing their concern might trigger people. The Facebook employee said they ‘have to be careful in how we approach.’ 

Flaherty asked, ‘If people are having the conversation, is the presumption that we let people have it. Direct them to CDC. What then?’ 

A Facebook employee replied, ‘We all know people that have had the experience that think that FB is listening to them.’ 

The Facebook employee told Flaherty that something like an immediate generated message about nosebleeds might give users ‘the Big Brother feel’ but suggested they show the content on a delay to avoid setting off alarm bells among users. 

‘We should pay attention to those conversations, make sure that people see information, even if it’s not right then,’ the Facebook employee said. 

Flaherty was involved in a tense exchange with GOP Rep. Jim Jordan, of Ohio, during a hearing on Capitol Hill earlier this year when Flaherty claimed that Elon Musk did not face ‘any adverse government actions’ in response to changing the outlet’s censorship policies.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House and the Harris-Walz campaign for comment but did not receive a response.

‘Ultimately, it was our decision whether or not to take content down, and we own our decisions, including COVID-19-related changes we made to our enforcement in the wake of this pressure,’ Zuckerberg wrote in his letter to the House Judiciary Committee this week. ‘I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it.

Fox News Digital’s Hillary Vaughn and Chase Williams contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
COUNTDOWN: Harris has just 4 days left to make good on sit-down interview proclamation
next post
Ex-Obama official predicts Harris will seek new Iran nuclear deal: ‘Has to be the goal’

Related Posts

Bush teams up with notorious Trump foes to...

July 3, 2025

Thune warns Iran should return to negotiating table...

June 18, 2025

‘It’s a mess’: Vulnerable House Dem shreds Biden...

October 23, 2024

CIA director blasts Democrat’s ‘offensive line of questioning’...

March 27, 2025

Department of Justice freezes all civil rights division...

January 23, 2025

Trump camp hits back after CNN host cuts...

June 25, 2024

Morning Glory: Will Democrats trade in Biden for...

April 4, 2024

DAVID MARCUS: Trump should bring back Anno Domini...

March 31, 2025

5 terrifying flashpoints that could ignite global war

June 9, 2025

Heightened ‘significance and importance’ as Vance, Walz face-off...

October 1, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • White House reveals highest-paid staffers–and 8 taking no salaries

      July 3, 2025
    • Trump $3.3T megabill sets House record for longest vote in history

      July 3, 2025
    • Iran nuclear program set back 2 years after US strikes: Pentagon

      July 3, 2025
    • Airlines secretly sold US travelers’ data to Homeland Security

      July 3, 2025
    • White House reveals highest-paid staffers – and 8 taking no salaries

      July 3, 2025
    • Jeffries stalls Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ for hours after House GOP mutiny breakthrough

      July 3, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      Top 5 Junior Copper Stocks on the TSXV in 2023

      December 22, 2023
    • 2

      Crypto Market 2023 Year-End Review

      December 22, 2023
    • 3

      Canada Silver Cobalt Begins Drilling at Lowney-Lac Edouard in Quebec, Targeting Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Mineralization

      December 22, 2023
    • 4

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 5

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024
    • 6

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 7

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023

    Categories

    • Business (1,397)
    • Investing (3,435)
    • Politics (4,507)
    • World (4,410)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved