New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

Politics

Havana Syndrome study halted as review finds some patients were coerced

by admin September 17, 2024
September 17, 2024
Havana Syndrome study halted as review finds some patients were coerced

A long-term study of Havana Syndrome patients was shut down after a National Institute of Health (NIH) internal review board found participants who reported being pressured to join the research.The study had until now not found evidence linking the participants to the same symptoms and brain injuries. The internal investigation that halted the study was prompted by complaints from the participants about unethical practices.

This comes after the intelligence community released an interim report last year concluding a foreign adversary is ‘very unlikely’ to be behind the symptoms hundreds of U.S. intelligence officers are experiencing, despite qualifying for U.S. government funded treatment of their brain injuries. 

In a statement to Fox News an NIH spokesperson stated, ‘In March 2024, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiated an investigation in response to concerns from participants who were evaluated as part of a study on Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI), the results of which were published in the journal JAMA. The investigation was conducted by the NIH Office of Intramural Research and the NIH Research Compliance Review Committee, an Institutional Review Board (IRB) within the NIH. The NIH investigation found that regulatory and NIH policy requirements for informed consent were not met due to coercion, although not on the part of NIH researchers.’

The statement continued, ‘Given the role of voluntary consent as a fundamental pillar of the ethical conduct of research, NIH has stopped the study out of an abundance of caution. In NIH’s assessment, these investigative findings do not impact the conclusions of the study. NIH has shared this update with both participants and JAMA.’

A former CIA officer, who goes by Adam to protect his identity, was not shocked that the study was shut down.

‘The way the study was conducted, at best, was dishonest and, at worst, wades into the criminal side of the scale,’ Adam said.

Adam is Havana Syndrome’s Patient Zero because he was the first to experience the severe sensory phenomena that hundreds of other U.S. government workers have experienced while stationed overseas in places like Havana and Moscow, even China. Adam described pressure to the brain that led to vertigo, tinnitus and cognitive impairment.

Active-duty service members, spies, FBI agents, diplomats and even children and pets have experienced this debilitating sensation that patients believe is caused by a pulsed energy weapon. 334 Americans have qualified to get treatment for Havana Syndrome in specialized military health facilities, according to a study released by the U.S. government accountability office earlier this year.

Adam, who was first attacked in December 2016 in his bedroom in Havana described hearing a loud sound penetrating his room. ‘Kind of like someone was taking a pencil and bouncing it off your eardrum… Eventually I started blacking out,’ Adam said.

Patients, like Adam, who participated in the NIH study raised concerns the CIA was including patients who didn’t really qualify as Havana Syndrome patients, watering down the data being analyzed by NIH researchers. Meanwhile, also pressuring those who needed treatment at Walter Reed to participate in the NIH study in order to get treatment at Walter Reed.

‘It became pretty clear quite quickly that something was amiss and how it was being handled and how patients were being filtered… the CIA dictated who would go. NIH often complained to us behind the scenes that the CIA was not providing adequate, matched control groups, and they flooded in a whole litany of people that likely weren’t connected or had other medical issues that really muddied the water,’ Adam said, accusing the NIH of working with the CIA.

The CIA is cooperating.

‘We cannot comment on whether any CIA officers participated in the study. However, we take any claim of coercion, or perceived coercion, extremely seriously and fully cooperated with NIH’s review of this matter, and have offered access to any information requested,’ a CIA official told Fox News in a statement noting that the ‘CIA Inspector General has been made aware of the NIH findings and prior related allegations.’ 

Havana Syndrome victims now want to pressure the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) to retract the two articles published last spring using early data from the NIH study that concluded there were no significant MRI-detectable evidence of brain injury among the group of participants compared with a group of matched control participants.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Brazilian mayoral candidate hospitalized after rival attacks him with metal chair: Watch
next post
China frees US pastor after nearly 20 years of wrongful detainment

Related Posts

Woman told House committee Matt Gaetz had sex...

November 15, 2024

Israel bans UN secretary-general over anti-Israel actions: ‘Doesn’t...

October 3, 2024

Trump has Christmas message to ‘Radical Left Lunatics,’...

December 26, 2024

Top Democratic super PAC launches massive $50M ad...

July 27, 2024

WATCH: AOC holds Queens town hall as 2028...

May 3, 2025

Harris claims Biden fit to continue in office,...

July 29, 2024

Black GOP lawmakers hold ‘Congress, Cognac, and Cigars’...

June 26, 2024

Russia’s military claims to have shot down 10...

May 15, 2024

Sen. Paul says Fauci deserves prison for COVID-19...

January 16, 2024

Extremists rise in new Palestinian Authority government as...

April 7, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Colombian model’s murder, just days after Mexican influencer shot on live stream, sparks condemnation of femicide

      May 19, 2025
    • Israel begins extensive Gaza ground operation after intense airstrikes kill more than 100 overnight

      May 19, 2025
    • These dragon’s blood trees exist in only one place on Earth. Now their survival is under threat

      May 19, 2025
    • Polish centrist and nationalist presidential candidates to face off in 2nd round

      May 19, 2025
    • Portugal’s ruling center-right alliance wins election, but far-right makes record gains

      May 19, 2025
    • Tanzanian opposition leader appears in court for treason trial

      May 19, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 2

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 3

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023
    • 4

      Americans are starting to feel better about the economy and inflation

      December 13, 2023
    • 5

      Rare Earths Stocks: 8 Biggest Companies in 2024

      January 12, 2024
    • 6

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024
    • 7

      Investing in Graphene Companies

      May 9, 2024

    Categories

    • Business (1,322)
    • Investing (3,130)
    • Politics (4,115)
    • World (4,067)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved