New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

Politics

124 Dems oppose historically bipartisan defense bill over restrictions on transgender treatments for minors

by admin December 12, 2024
December 12, 2024
124 Dems oppose historically bipartisan defense bill over restrictions on transgender treatments for minors

The House voted Wednesday to pass its yearly defense bill that would give junior enlisted troops a significant pay bump and work to eliminate DEI programs at the Pentagon.

It passed 281-140, with 16 Republicans voting no. Only 81 Democrats voted yes – 124 voting no – a much larger margin than in years passed when the legislation typically enjoyed bipartisan support. 

Many Democrats opposed a provision of the bill that restricts coverage of transgender treatments for minors. 

The legislation now heads to the Senate for passage before heading to President Joe Biden’s desk for signature. 

The 1,800-page bill known as the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), details how $895.2 billion allocated toward defense and national security will be spent. It will be voted on more than two months after the start of the fiscal year. 

The $895.2 billion represents a 1% increase over last year’s budget, a smaller number than some defense hawks would have liked. 

A significant portion of the legislation focused on quality-of-life improvements for service members amid record recruitment issues, a focus of much bipartisan discussion over the last year. That includes a 14.5% pay increase for junior enlisted troops and increasing access to child care for service members while also providing job support to military spouses.

The measure authorizes a 4.5% across-the-board pay raise for all service members starting Jan. 1. 

The NDAA typically enjoys wide bipartisan support, but this year’s focus on eliminating ‘woke’ policies could be hard for Democrats to stomach.

The policy proposal to prohibit Tricare, the military’s health care provider, from covering transgender services for the minor dependents of service members has raised concerns, prompting the leading Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, to reconsider his support for the bill.

‘Blanketly denying health care to people who clearly need it, just because of a biased notion against transgender people, is wrong,’ he said in a statement. ‘This provision injected a level of partisanship not traditionally seen in defense bills.’

The goal of that provision is to prevent any ‘medical interventions that could result in sterilization’ of minors.

Other provisions, like a blanket ban on funding for gender transition surgeries for adults, did not make their way into the bill, neither did a ban on requiring masks to prevent the spread of diseases. 

The bill also supports deploying the National Guard to the southern border to help with illegal immigrant apprehensions and drug flow. 

Another provision opens the door to allowing airmen and Space Force personnel to grow facial hair; it directs the secretary of the Air Force to brief lawmakers on ‘the feasibility and advisability’ of establishing a pilot program to test out allowing beards. 

Democrats are also upset the bill did not include a provision expanding access to IVF for service members. Currently, military health care only covers IVF for troops whose infertility is linked to service-related illness or injury.

But the bill did not include an amendment to walk back a provision allowing the Pentagon to reimburse service members who have to travel out of state to get an abortion.

The bill extends a hiring freeze on DEI-related roles and stops all such recruitment until ‘an investigation of the Pentagon’s DEI programs’ can be completed.

It also bans the Defense Department from contracting with advertising companies ‘that blacklist conservative news sources,’ according to an internal GOP memo.

The memo said the NDAA also guts funding for the Biden administration’s ‘Countering Extremist Activity Working Group’ dedicated to rooting out extremism in the military’s ranks. The annual defense policy bill also does not authorize ‘any climate change programs’ and prohibits the Pentagon from issuing climate impact-based guidance on weapons systems.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., touted $31 billion in savings in the legislation that would come from cutting ‘inefficient programs, obsolete weapons, and bloated Pentagon bureaucracy.’

The compromise NDAA bill, negotiated between Republican and Democrat leadership, sets policy for the nation’s largest government agency, but a separate defense spending bill must be passed to allocate funds for such programs.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Conservatives tout victory after stopping last-minute Schumer push to confirm key agency head: ‘Outstanding’
next post
New poll reveals what Americans think of Trump’s transition decisions

Related Posts

DNI Gabbard refers intel officials to DOJ for...

April 24, 2025

War torn regions have keen interest in US...

October 30, 2024

Trump turns conviction into cash, spotlights record fundraising...

June 1, 2024

US still has no UN ambassador as world...

June 17, 2025

Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners released in swap with...

May 24, 2025

Federal judge rules Trump’s firing of head of...

March 2, 2025

McCaul demands UNRWA chief testify before Congress over...

March 2, 2024

Israel cease-fire deal has critics worried over Biden,...

November 30, 2024

HHS probing hospital over firing of nurse who...

April 18, 2025

Jack Smith asks judge to block Trump from...

December 28, 2023

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • ‘Life is full of unexpected surprises’: People trying to call Iran meet mysterious voice message

      June 22, 2025
    • Pakistan nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, praising ‘stellar statemanship’

      June 22, 2025
    • ‘It’s a scary time to be here right now’: Americans stuck in Israel are desperate to get out

      June 22, 2025
    • Belarus frees key opposition figure Sergey Tikhanovsky following rare visit from top US envoy

      June 22, 2025
    • Negotiations are ‘meaningless’ unless Israel stops attacks, Iran government spokesperson tells CNN

      June 22, 2025
    • A celebrity draft-dodging scandal lays bare problems with Taiwan’s crucial reservist force

      June 22, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 2

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 3

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024
    • 4

      Americans are starting to feel better about the economy and inflation

      December 13, 2023
    • 5

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023
    • 6

      Rare Earths Stocks: 8 Biggest Companies in 2024

      January 12, 2024
    • 7

      Investing in Graphene Companies

      May 9, 2024

    Categories

    • Business (1,378)
    • Investing (3,360)
    • Politics (4,401)
    • World (4,332)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved