New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

World

How badly have US strikes damaged Iran’s nuclear facilities? Here’s what to know

by admin June 23, 2025
June 23, 2025
How badly have US strikes damaged Iran’s nuclear facilities? Here’s what to know

Warplanes. Submarines. Cruise missiles. Bombs that weigh 30,000 pounds.

After initially favoring diplomacy, US President Donald Trump resorted to an extraordinary use of force against Iran on Saturday night, striking three of the regime’s key nuclear sites.

Trump claimed Iran’s nuclear facilities had been “obliterated,” but some Iranian officials downplayed the impact of the strikes – just as they did when Israel first struck Iran’s facilities on June 13.

With satellite imagery of the overnight strikes beginning to emerge, here’s what we know about the damage the US inflicted on Iran’s nuclear program.

Fordow

Fordow is Iran’s most important nuclear enrichment facility, buried deep inside a mountain to guard it from attacks.

The main halls are believed to be some 80 to 90 meters (262 to 295 feet) below ground. Analysts have long said that the US is the only military in the world with the kind of bomb required to burrow that deeply – the enormous, 30,000-pound GBU-57.

The images, captured by Maxar, showed six separate impact craters in two nearby locations at Fordow. The craters are visible along a ridge running over the underground complex.

“Of course, one cannot exclude (the possibility) that there is significant damage there,” he said.

This satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows the Fordow enrichment facility in Iran before and after US strikes. Maxar Technologies

“Total destruction of the underground hall is quite possible,” Albright said, while stressing that a full assessment of the damage will take time.

N.R. Jenzen-Jones, a munitions specialist and director of the research company Armament Research Services (ARES), concurred that there are at least six entry points in Fordow following the US strikes.

“This is consistent with the theory of an attack on such a deeply buried target as the Fordow site, which would require multiple precisely delivered, and carefully calibrated, penetrating munitions to essentially ‘smash’ and blast their way through to the deeper, more protected areas of the site,” he added.

Satellite imagery also showed significant changes to the color of the mountainside where the facility is housed, indicating a vast area was covered with a layer of grey ash in the aftermath of the strikes.

Although Iran’s foreign minister said the US had crossed a “very big red line,” other Iranian leaders downplayed the strikes’ impact. Manan Raeisi, a lawmaker representing the city of Qom, near Fordow, said the damage from the attack was “quite superficial.”

Natanz

Natanz is the site of Iran’s largest nuclear enrichment center and was targeted in Israel’s initial attack on Iran on June 13. The site has six above-ground buildings and three underground structures, which house centrifuges – a key technology in nuclear enrichment, turning uranium into nuclear fuel.

The above-ground facilities were damaged in Israel’s initial attack. The IAEA said the strikes damaged electrical infrastructure at the plant.

Although it is not clear if Israel’s strikes caused direct damage to the underground facilities, the IAEA said the loss of power to the underground cascade hall “may have damaged the centrifuges there.”

The US also targeted Natanz in its Saturday night operation. A US official said a B-2 bomber had dropped two bunker-busting bombs on the site.

US Navy submarines also fired 30 TLAM cruise missiles at Natanz and Isfahan, the third Iranian site targeted by the US.

Isfahan

Isfahan, in central Iran, is home to the country’s largest nuclear research complex.

The facility was built with support from China and opened in 1984, according to the nonprofit Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). Some 3,000 scientists are employed at Isfahan, NTI says, and the site is “suspected of being the center” of Iran’s nuclear program.

Albright said initial reports suggested that the US also struck tunnel complexes near the Isfahan site, “where they typically store enriched uranium.”

If confirmed, Albright said this would show that the US was trying to take out Iran’s stocks of uranium that had been enriched to 20% and 60%. Weapons-grade uranium is enriched to 90%.

At a Pentagon news conference Sunday, Gen. Dan Caine, US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said a US submarine had “launched more than a dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles against key surface infrastructure targets” at the Isfahan site.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Suicide bomber attack on church in Syria kills at least 20 people
next post
Apple sued by shareholders who allege it overstated AI progress

Related Posts

Several people sustain ‘life-threatening’ injuries in knife attack...

May 24, 2025

Exclusive: Israeli forces fired on food convoy in...

February 21, 2024

Israeli soldiers reveal systematic destruction of Palestinian property...

April 7, 2025

Flutterwave CEO GB Agboola on rebuilding trust, and...

October 17, 2024

The US still has not had a woman...

December 22, 2024

Ukraine hit by another night of deadly Russian...

April 25, 2025

CNN Heroes Legal Disclosures 2024

July 27, 2024

Mexico announces arrests of alleged high ranking Sinaloa...

February 22, 2025

The mission to clean up one of Central...

August 19, 2024

Russia says it has recaptured key Kursk region...

March 13, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Iran vows retaliation if UN Security Council issues snapback sanctions on anniversary of nuclear deal

      July 15, 2025
    • ‘Held accountable’: Sen. Rand Paul again vows to issue a criminal referral for Fauci

      July 15, 2025
    • Hawley urges DHS Secretary Noem to declassify all Trump Butler rally assassination attempt documents

      July 15, 2025
    • America has the power to lead the AI revolution – and the leadership to make it happen

      July 15, 2025
    • ‘Squad’ members ‘decide to lie and twist facts’ about Israel’s history, says prominent Arab activist

      July 15, 2025
    • Mike Waltz gears up for post-Signalgate ‘brutal’ grilling from Dems in UN ambassador hearing

      July 15, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      Top 5 Junior Copper Stocks on the TSXV in 2023

      December 22, 2023
    • 2

      Crypto Market 2023 Year-End Review

      December 22, 2023
    • 3

      Canada Silver Cobalt Begins Drilling at Lowney-Lac Edouard in Quebec, Targeting Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Mineralization

      December 22, 2023
    • 4

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 5

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 6

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023
    • 7

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024

    Categories

    • Business (1,409)
    • Investing (3,514)
    • Politics (4,591)
    • World (4,461)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved