New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

Politics

Sen. Paul says Fauci deserves prison for COVID-19 mishandling: ‘There was no science’

by admin January 16, 2024
January 16, 2024
Sen. Paul says Fauci deserves prison for COVID-19 mishandling: ‘There was no science’
Read this article for free!
Plus get unlimited access to thousands of articles, videos and more with your free account!
Please enter a valid email address.
By entering your email, you are agreeing to Fox News Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said in an interview Monday that Dr. Anthony Fauci will not go down favorably in history over his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that the former presidential medical advisor should be behind bars for purportedly lying to Congress in previous hearings.  

‘His actions in covering up the origins of the virus will go down in history as probably one of the most egregious and infamous public health decisions in our lifetime,’ Paul told Fox News Digital in an interview Monday. 

‘Every step of the way, Fauci has publicly protested and said ‘we never funded any gain function research in Wuhan,’ but if you look at his private emails, it tells a different story,’ Paul said. 

Gain-of-function research involves manipulating the genes of microorganisms to give them new functions or characteristics. In the context of COVID-19, gain-of-function research found that the virus could have originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, and involved experiments that enhanced its transmissibility, or pathogenicity.

In previous congressional testimony, Fauci refuted claims that the National Institutes of Health had financed gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab — the epicenter of the pandemic that originated in late 2019 and would soar to pandemic proportions in 2020.

Fauci testified for the second time last week in private before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, which is investigating the origins of the virus. 

The committee’s chairman, Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, was reportedly perturbed that Fauci was unable to recall decisions or circumstances from the early stages of the outbreak, which claimed the lives of 1.1 million Americans, he wrote in a statement.

‘Lying to Congress is a felony punishable up to five years in prison. When he came and told me that he did not find gain-of-function research and move on — that was a bald-faced lie. I gave him a chance to correct the record a month later when he came back to the committee, and he refused to do so,’ Paul said.

‘And to this day, he has been dissembling and really trying to point blame away from him, but that’s a felony,’ he said. 

Fauci also testified that the lab leak hypothesis — which was often suppressed — was not a conspiracy theory and that the policies and mandates he promoted may increase vaccine hesitancy in the future, Wenstrup wrote in a statement Wednesday. 

Wenstrup said Fauci played semantics with the definition of a ‘lab leak’ while acknowledging that a lab leak was possible.

Wenstrup said the admission came nearly four years after the publication of the ‘Proximal Origin’ paper that attempted to vilify and disprove the lab leak hypothesis.

Fauci also denied allegations that he visited the CIA during the pandemic or influenced the CIA’s investigation into the origins of COVID-19.

‘Dr. Fauci’s transcribed interview revealed systemic failures in our public health system and shed light on serious procedural concerns with our public health authority,’ wrote Wenstrup, a physician of over 30 years.

‘It is clear that dissenting opinions were often not considered or suppressed completely. Should a future pandemic arise, America’s response must be guided by scientific facts and conclusive data.’

Paul, who is also an eye doctor, said the reason he ‘continues to dwell’ on Fauci’s handling of the pandemic is because he aims ‘to pass legislation that creates an independent commission that will regulate gain-of-function research and try to prevent some of the more dangerous research from ever occurring.’

‘There was no science,’ Paul said of the COVID-19 guidelines like social distancing and quarantine. ‘This was sort of medieval type of conclusions. And I think history will judge him harshly for doing this.’

Fox News Digital has reached out to Fauci for comment.

Fox News’ Michael Dorgan contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
FBI’s post honoring MLK flagged by X with fact-checking community note
next post
New England fishermen fighting ‘government overreach’ hope to catch a big win at Supreme Court

Related Posts

Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ faces setback as Senate...

June 26, 2025

Chief Justice John Roberts pauses judge’s order for...

February 27, 2025

Congress likely to punt government shutdown deadlines again,...

February 23, 2024

Obama WH physician says Biden doc should have...

June 9, 2025

Here’s what happened during Trump’s 11th week in...

April 5, 2025

Johnson demands Zelenskyy fire Ukraine’s ambassador to US...

September 26, 2024

Dems attack Johnson over impassioned Columbia speech condemning...

April 26, 2024

FBI’s post honoring MLK flagged by X with...

January 16, 2024

Kennedy and Milei double down on WHO exit...

May 28, 2025

New report warns NATO’s data vulnerabilities could cost...

May 3, 2025

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • At 90, the Dalai Lama braces for final showdown with Beijing: his reincarnation

      July 4, 2025
    • Russia becomes first nation to recognize Taliban government of Afghanistan since 2021 takeover

      July 4, 2025
    • Two arrested over ‘Chinese blessing scams’ targeting elderly Asian women in Australia

      July 4, 2025
    • Russia launches record number of drones at Ukraine after latest Trump-Putin phone call

      July 4, 2025
    • Elephant kills two female tourists from the UK and New Zealand in Zambian national park

      July 4, 2025
    • What is happening in South Korea? Seoul has caught the lovebug that nobody wants

      July 4, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      Top 5 Junior Copper Stocks on the TSXV in 2023

      December 22, 2023
    • 2

      Canada Silver Cobalt Begins Drilling at Lowney-Lac Edouard in Quebec, Targeting Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Mineralization

      December 22, 2023
    • 3

      Crypto Market 2023 Year-End Review

      December 22, 2023
    • 4

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 5

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024
    • 6

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 7

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023

    Categories

    • Business (1,398)
    • Investing (3,442)
    • Politics (4,517)
    • World (4,416)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved