New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

Politics

GOP senators demand the FBI ‘repair the damage’ to it’s credibility over anti-Catholic memo debacle

by admin February 2, 2024
February 2, 2024
GOP senators demand the FBI ‘repair the damage’ to it’s credibility over anti-Catholic memo debacle

A group of Republican senators are demanding that the Federal Bureau of Investigation ‘repair the damage’ to its credibility after a series of errors surrounding the origin of the anti-Catholic memo that targeted traditional Catholics as potential ‘terrorists.’

The memo, which has since been retracted by its creators in the FBI Richmond field office, was a focus in congressional oversight action and hearings last year and garnered significant criticism by Republican lawmakers. 

In a letter obtained by Fox News Digital, Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. and 14 of their colleagues, demanded FBI Director Christopher Wray give a ‘coherent and complete response’ to the Senate after its apparent failures in reviewing how the memo was ever created and the agency’s compliance with congressional oversight on the matter. 

‘We are writing about the FBI’s failure to provide information requested by members relating to the now infamous Richmond memo while misleading this body with what little information it did provide,’ the senators wrote. 

‘We recently also learned that the FBI permanently deleted critical records related to the memo, and one of the authors of the Richmond memo prepared a second, external report in coordination with headquarters that was intended to be circulated outside the Richmond office to the full FBI,’ they said. 

According to the lawmakers, the FBI ‘for months used its internal review of the Richmond memo as an excuse not to provide records or respond to members’ questions.’

‘Despite the completion of what we now know was a very narrow internal review, limited to only certain aspects of this single internal analyst report, FBI has repeatedly ignored member requests for records that would enable Congress to conduct its own investigation. This includes FBI’s repeated failure to fulfill the March 1, 2023, request by the Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee, Charles Grassley, and Judiciary Committee Ranking Member, Lindsey Graham,’ the letter states. 

The ranking members asked the agency for copies of the correspondence between the intelligence analysts who drafted the Richmond memo and anyone of higher rank related to the report, an unredacted copy of the Domain Perspective memo, and a copy of all reports issued within FBI or DOJ within the past five years alleging a link between any primarily religious or conservative association or entity and violent extremism.

‘Now we know that information related to the Richmond memo wasn’t provided to Congress because the FBI deleted the records as soon as the incident became public,’ the lawmakers stated, citing a report released by the House Judiciary Committee on Dec. 4, in which Deputy Director Paul Abbate ordered Richmond Special Agent in Charge Stanley Meador to ‘take [the memo] down’ as soon as it became public. 

According to Meador, there was then a ‘follow-up call’ from Tanya Ugoretz, the FBI’s assistant director of the Directorate of Intelligence, which ordered Meador to notify the deputy director and Ugoretz, ‘‘when [he] had taken the necessary steps’ to remove the memorandum, and anything referring to the document, from FBI systems,’ the senators note. 

‘FBI must provide an immediate explanation for its order to delete records related to this incident, which not only obstructs congressional oversight, but also means the FBI’s internal review itself did not have access to documents that may have provided critical information on the incident. The FBI must also explain why it withheld this information from the Senate, despite repeated requests for records,’ they said. 

The senators said that based on now-available information, Wray’s claims under oath before Congress that the memo was ‘a single product by a single field office’ was ‘misleading, and that other offices had significant contributions to the memo.

‘Despite the internal memo’s obvious flaws, it was approved by layers of FBI bureaucracy, including the Chief Division Counsel and the Special Agent in Charge (SAC),’ the senators wrote. 

‘Indeed, FBI’s October 27 letter indicated that a total of seven individuals were involved in the drafting, review, and approval of the memo,’ they said. 

‘That a product this defective was reviewed by seven FBI employees and senior agents is evidence of a cultural problem at FBI that points well beyond a single report,’ they said. ‘This broader crisis of FBI leadership is part of an ongoing pattern of weaponization of federal law enforcement against ordinary citizens that we have warned you about at length, and which the FBI must address,’ they said. 

The FBI must respond to the senators by Feb. 14. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Iran-backed Houthi launch three attacks in Red Sea, Gulf of Aden as tensions escalate; US military responds
next post
Fox News Poll: Trump leads Biden in Georgia, receiving just over 50% support

Related Posts

Israeli defense minister orders IDF to plan for...

February 6, 2025

House Republicans rebuke Biden for ‘one-sided pressure’ on...

April 9, 2024

Pompeo doesn’t rule out serving in second Trump...

March 9, 2024

Javier Milei first world leader to meet with...

November 15, 2024

Federal judge partially blocks Trump’s effort to deny...

April 25, 2025

Biden administration launches national strategy to combat Islamophobia,...

December 13, 2024

Jim Jordan subpoenas company led by daughter of...

August 29, 2024

Rosie O’Donnell flees US after Trump win, won’t...

March 12, 2025

Hamas terror attack exposes Al Jazeera for what...

March 8, 2024

Comer rejects Democrats’ demand for hearing on ‘influence...

March 28, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • October 7 families demand to know the number of Gaza hostages still alive, after Trump said 3 more have died

      May 8, 2025
    • Putin’s Victory Day ceasefire set to come into effect

      May 8, 2025
    • Syrian president says his government is holding indirect talks with Israel

      May 8, 2025
    • This American soldier witnessed the Nazi surrender. 80 years later, he’s still happy to be home

      May 8, 2025
    • China’s Xi hails ‘stable and resilient’ Russia ties as he shows solidarity with Putin in Moscow

      May 8, 2025
    • India and Pakistan are both claiming victory after this week’s clashes. Will cooler heads prevail?

      May 8, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 2

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 3

      Americans are starting to feel better about the economy and inflation

      December 13, 2023
    • 4

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023
    • 5

      Rare Earths Stocks: 8 Biggest Companies in 2024

      January 12, 2024
    • 6

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024
    • 7

      Investing in Graphene Companies

      May 9, 2024

    Categories

    • Business (1,301)
    • Investing (3,058)
    • Politics (4,020)
    • World (3,969)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved