New Market Perspective
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • World

New Market Perspective

Politics

Former Justice Breyer throws cold water on theory Dobbs leak came from a justice: ‘I’d be amazed’

by admin March 26, 2024
March 26, 2024
Former Justice Breyer throws cold water on theory Dobbs leak came from a justice: ‘I’d be amazed’

Retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said he’d be ‘amazed’ if a fellow justice leaked the court’s draft decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022, which effectively ended the recognition of a constitutional right to abortion. 

‘Do you have a sense of what the motive of the leaker was?’ NBC’s Kristen Welker asked Breyer in an interview aired Sunday on ‘Meet the Press.’ 

Breyer shied away from answering directly, saying he does have theories, but that he was not willing to discuss them at length. Breyer, who retired in 2022, did say who he thought did not leak the draft opinion. 

‘I’d be amazed if it was a judge,’ he said. 

Breyer’s comments came amid an interview on his new book, ‘Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism,’ which is critical of conservative justices for their decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. 

The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization in June 2022 to uphold a Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The decision came just weeks after an unprecedented draft leak published by Politico showed Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion outlining the decision to effectively end the recognition of a constitutional right to abortion. 

Following the leak, churches and pro-life groups saw violent and destructive attacks, including a pro-life center in New York getting ‘firebombed’ by protesters, menacing graffiti on church properties across the nation, and a letter from a radical abortion group called ‘Jane’s Revenge’ declaring ‘open season’ on pro-lifers. Conservative justices also saw repeated protests outside their homes in response to the leak and ultimate decision. 

In previously aired portions of the interview, Breyer had described the leak as ‘unfortunate.’ 

‘It’s unfortunate,’ he said, with Welker following up and asking, ‘Were you angry?’

‘You try to avoid getting angry or that – you try in the job – you try to remain as calm, reasonable and serious as possible,’ he said.

‘I think it was unfortunate,’ he repeated. Supreme Court justices, as Breyer noted in his interview, are extremely careful about publicly speaking on issues that could land before them in court. Breyer appeared to continue with this tradition in his retirement, choosing his words carefully as Welker peppered him with questions on the leak and landmark decision. 

Breyer joined Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor in writing the dissent to the decision, and said in the interview he did not believe Roe should have been overturned. 

Welker continued asking if Breyer was hopeful the justices could reach a compromise regarding allowing abortion at 15 weeks ahead of the decision. 

‘Did you think that a compromise was possible before the leak around 15 weeks?’ Welker asked. 

‘I usually hope for compromise,’ Breyer responded. 

‘So you were hopeful there could be a compromise?’ she continued. 

‘You want to put words in my mouth,’ Breyer responded lightheartedly. ‘I’m careful what I say on this. Because I say our interests are different. I don’t want to make news. I’ve written what I thought. If you think there’s news in here or in the dissent, go right ahead. But, I don’t want to say something in addition.’

Breyer added that he ‘always’ thinks compromise is possible. 

The retired justice also shied away from answering whether he was ‘surprised’ an internal investigation into the leak did not identify a person as responsible. 

‘You want to ask that question to somebody who knows something about it. Ask the people who do internal investigations like that. They’re the people to ask and that they occur all over the government,’ he responded, adding that he was simply ‘disappointed, I was sorry about the leak.’

When asked if he foresees the Dobbs case one day being overturned, Breyer said, ‘It’s possible.’

‘Don’t know… It’s possible,’ he said. ‘But who knows?’

Breyer was nominated to the nation’s highest court by President Bill Clinton to fill former Justice Harry Blackmun’s seat in 1994. Blackmun wrote the court’s opinion on Roe v. Wade in 1973. 

Breyer resigned in 2022, with President Biden nominating Ketanji Brown Jackson as the successor. She was confirmed the same year. 

Fox News Digital’s Gabriel Hays contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Morning Glory: Ronna McDaniel was the best hire NBC could make
next post
137 school children kidnapped by gunmen in Nigeria released, undergoing ‘psychosocial counseling,’ official says

Related Posts

Ceasefire over as Israel strikes Gaza after Hamas...

March 18, 2025

Prince William calls for end of war in...

February 21, 2024

Project 2025 leader steps down amid criticism from...

July 31, 2024

Venezuelan prosecutor seeks arrest warrant for opposition’s former...

September 3, 2024

UN overwhelmingly votes for humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza,...

December 13, 2023

Dozens of prominent veterans sign onto letter supporting...

December 7, 2024

Harris, Trump favorability ratings are on the rise...

August 15, 2024

Dem senator looks to hijack key Trump budget...

April 5, 2025

Schumer coins ‘Trump shutdown,’ slamming GOP amid spending...

September 20, 2024

Germany accuses Elon Musk of trying to interfere...

December 31, 2024

    Get free access to all of the retirement secrets and income strategies from our experts! or Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get the Premium Articles Acess for Free


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • At 90, the Dalai Lama braces for final showdown with Beijing: his reincarnation

      July 4, 2025
    • Russia becomes first nation to recognize Taliban government of Afghanistan since 2021 takeover

      July 4, 2025
    • Two arrested over ‘Chinese blessing scams’ targeting elderly Asian women in Australia

      July 4, 2025
    • Russia launches record number of drones at Ukraine after latest Trump-Putin phone call

      July 4, 2025
    • Elephant kills two female tourists from the UK and New Zealand in Zambian national park

      July 4, 2025
    • What is happening in South Korea? Seoul has caught the lovebug that nobody wants

      July 4, 2025

    Popular

    • 1

      Top 5 Junior Copper Stocks on the TSXV in 2023

      December 22, 2023
    • 2

      Canada Silver Cobalt Begins Drilling at Lowney-Lac Edouard in Quebec, Targeting Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Mineralization

      December 22, 2023
    • 3

      Crypto Market 2023 Year-End Review

      December 22, 2023
    • 4

      10 Top Oil-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      October 19, 2024
    • 5

      Top 10 Uranium-producing Countries (Updated 2024)

      April 18, 2024
    • 6

      Powered by rain, this seed carrier could help reforest the most remote areas

      December 19, 2023
    • 7

      A troubling theory about traders profiting from Hamas’ attack on Israel drew much attention. Why it may not be so simple.

      December 13, 2023

    Categories

    • Business (1,398)
    • Investing (3,442)
    • Politics (4,517)
    • World (4,416)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: newmarketperspective.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


    Copyright © 2025 newmarketperspective.com | All Rights Reserved